**50 Cent Takes Legal Action Against TraxNYC for Trademark Infringement**
50 Cent, the renowned rapper, has initiated legal proceedings against TraxNYC and its owner, Maksud Agadjani, asserting claims of trademark infringement and violation of his publicity rights. The lawsuit stems from TraxNYC’s recent TikTok posts that falsely suggest a partnership between the rapper and the jeweler. 50 Cent, whose real name is Curtis Jackson, disapproves of TraxNYC using his image to promote knockoff jewelry, emphasizing he has never purchased or endorsed their products.
In the complaint revealed by TMZ Hip Hop, 50 Cent is seeking a minimum of $5 million in damages, underlining his serious stance on the unauthorized usage of his likeness for commercial gain. This follows previous warnings issued by the rapper, which TraxNYC seemed to dismiss. The jeweler’s provocative social media approach has now landed them in legal trouble, as 50 Cent aims to protect his brand and reputation.
### FAQ Section
**Q: What is 50 Cent suing TraxNYC for?**
A: 50 Cent is suing TraxNYC for trademark infringement and violation of his right of publicity, claiming the jeweler misled consumers into thinking he endorsed their products.
**Q: How much in damages is 50 Cent seeking?**
A: 50 Cent is seeking at least $5 million in damages as part of his lawsuit.
**Q: What sparked the legal action?**
A: The legal action was initiated following a series of TikTok posts by TraxNYC that featured 50 Cent’s image and implied a connection to their jewelry, which the rapper claims is unauthorized.
**Q: Has 50 Cent been associated with TraxNYC in the past?**
A: No, 50 Cent asserts he has never bought jewelry from TraxNYC nor permitted them to use his image for profit.
### Conclusion
50 Cent’s legal battle with TraxNYC is a clear example of the importance of protecting one’s brand and image in the entertainment industry. This lawsuit not only highlights the issue of trademark infringement but also raises important questions about how celebrity images are utilized in marketing. As the case unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the boundaries between personal branding and commercial exploitation. 50 Cent’s strong approach indicates that he is determined to defend his reputation and ensure that unauthorized usage of his likeness is addressed.