Jussie Smollett informs the Supreme Court of Illinois that a deal is a deal. This pertains to the agreement prosecutors made when they dismissed the initial charge for staging an attack, therefore he should never have been accused and prosecuted a second time.
Smollett has just filed legal documents before the highest court in the land of Lincoln, claiming that after being charged for the first time by a Grand Jury of Cook County, the State’s Attorney offered him a deal… to do community service and waive his bond in the City of Chicago. This way, the case would not be prosecuted.
Jussie points to the prosecutor, who said: “After reviewing the facts and circumstances of the case, including Mr. Smollett’s voluntary service in the community and agreement to waive his bond to the city of Chicago, the State’s motion with respect to the charge is nolle pros (not to prosecute).”
The prosecutor added: “We believe this outcome is a fair disposition and the appropriate resolution of this case.”
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is Jussie Smollett’s current legal battle about?
Jussie Smollett is arguing that he had an agreement with the prosecutors to not be prosecuted after the initial charge was dismissed.
2. Why did the Illinois Supreme Court become involved in Smollett’s case?
Jussie Smollett’s legal argument was rejected by the lower court levels, leading him to seek the intervention of the Supreme Court of Illinois.
Conclusion
Jussie Smollett’s legal battle continues as he asserts his agreement with prosecutors to avoid further prosecution. The outcome of this case will have significant implications on the perception of justice and legal procedures.